|
|
|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
No Subject
- From: =3D?big5?q?=3DA6=3DB6=3DB0=3DEA=3DB9=3DA9?=3D@phoebe.hosting4u.net, =@phoebe.hosting4u.net
- Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 14:46:14 +0800 (CST)
- Cc: recipient list not shown: ;
- Delivered-To: zeus-waterma-watermarking-list@phoebe.hosting4u.net
<chukuodin@yahoo.com.tw>
Subject: [WM]: Watermark detection using non-normalized correlation
To: <watermarking@watermarkingworld.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3Dbig5
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Rcpt-To: <watermarking@watermarkingworld.org>
Sender: watermarking-owner@watermarkingworld.org
Precedence: bulk
Dear Mr. /Ms.
We calculate correlation between original watermark and retrieval =
watermark in general situation, but the paper "SEMI-FRAGILE
WATERMARKING FOR VIDEO QUALITY EVALUATION IN BROADCAST SCENARIO" =
mentions that we can get a "correlation" between watermark and
image at encode side, then add watermark directly into DCT coefficient, =
decoder can calculate "non-normalized correlation" between
watermark and embedded coefficient. But this paper doesn=A1=A6t explain =
the procedure that calculates correlation in detail.
Does anyone know how to calculate the "non-normalized correlation" =
between image and watermark?
Thanks for your help.
______________________________________________________________________________
Watermarking Mailing List - http://www.watermarkingworld.org/ml.html
To unsubscribe send email to "majordomo@watermarkingworld.org" with
"unsubscribe watermarking YOURMAIL" in the body.
______________________________________________________________________________
|