WMW
  NEWS     ABOUT     PARTNERS     CONTACT  
  HELP
WATERMARKING
  • Biography
  • FAQ
MAILINGLIST
  • Management
  • Archive
CONFERENCES
  • Calls
BENCHMARKING
  • Stirmark
  • CheckMark
  • Optimark
BOOKS
LINKS
  • Companies
  • Research
  • Others
WEBRING
DISCLAIMER

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

No Subject


  • From: =3D?big5?q?=3DA6=3DB6=3DB0=3DEA=3DB9=3DA9?=3D@phoebe.hosting4u.net, =@phoebe.hosting4u.net
  • Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 14:46:14 +0800 (CST)
  • Cc: recipient list not shown: ;
  • Delivered-To: zeus-waterma-watermarking-list@phoebe.hosting4u.net

<chukuodin@yahoo.com.tw>
Subject: [WM]: Watermark detection using non-normalized correlation
To: <watermarking@watermarkingworld.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3Dbig5
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Rcpt-To: <watermarking@watermarkingworld.org>
Sender: watermarking-owner@watermarkingworld.org
Precedence: bulk

Dear Mr. /Ms.

We calculate correlation between original watermark and retrieval =
watermark in general situation, but the paper "SEMI-FRAGILE
WATERMARKING FOR VIDEO QUALITY EVALUATION IN BROADCAST SCENARIO" =
mentions that we can get a "correlation" between watermark and
image at encode side, then add watermark directly into DCT coefficient, =
decoder can calculate "non-normalized correlation" between
watermark and embedded coefficient. But this paper doesn=A1=A6t explain =
the procedure that calculates correlation in detail.

Does anyone know how to calculate the "non-normalized correlation" =
between image and watermark?

Thanks for your help.



______________________________________________________________________________

Watermarking Mailing List - http://www.watermarkingworld.org/ml.html
To unsubscribe send email to "majordomo@watermarkingworld.org" with
"unsubscribe watermarking YOURMAIL" in the body.
______________________________________________________________________________




© 2000-2002 by WatermarkingWorld
Design and Concept by Martin Kutter