WMW
  NEWS     ABOUT     PARTNERS     CONTACT  
  HELP
WATERMARKING
  • Biography
  • FAQ
MAILINGLIST
  • Management
  • Archive
CONFERENCES
  • Calls
BENCHMARKING
  • Stirmark
  • CheckMark
  • Optimark
BOOKS
LINKS
  • Companies
  • Research
  • Others
WEBRING
DISCLAIMER

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [WM]: SS or QIM? Which is secure(Comparitively)?



The question has been discussed in the Mailist before, u can see the archives of the list.
Or u may refer to the two articles in IEEE SINGAL PROCESSING MAGZIN in SEP. 2003. "what is the future for watermarking?"
u can see the opinions from the specilists in the field such as Moulin, Cox, Memon, Kalker et.al., which may be helpful although
about two years have  passed.
 
 

Bhanu Prasad <watermark_bhanu@yahoo.com> wrote:
Hi,
I am working on my Masters Thesis.It is based on SS audio watermarking.SS and QIM seem to be the dominating technologies.SS is
simple.QIM seems to be complex.

Which one has the future?

Post your opinions



K.Bhanu Prasad





______________________________________________________________________________

Watermarking Mailing List - http://www.watermarkingworld.org/ml.html
To unsubscribe send email to "majordomo@watermarkingworld.org" with
"unsubscribe watermarking YOURMAIL" in the body.
______________________________________________________________________________




© 2000-2002 by WatermarkingWorld
Design and Concept by Martin Kutter