WMW
  NEWS     ABOUT     PARTNERS     CONTACT  
  HELP
WATERMARKING
  • Biography
  • FAQ
MAILINGLIST
  • Management
  • Archive
CONFERENCES
  • Calls
BENCHMARKING
  • Stirmark
  • CheckMark
  • Optimark
BOOKS
LINKS
  • Companies
  • Research
  • Others
WEBRING
DISCLAIMER

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [WM]: Questions about JPEG compression attack



Cheong David wrote:
> I have implemented a PGM watermarking system and i want to test its 
> detection rate against JPEG compression attack. So after i watermarked 
> the image, i convert it into JPEG with certain percent quality, then 
> back to PGM image again for detection. However, i found that for the 
> detection rate of attack of 90% quality JPEG compression, it is lower 
> than 70% quality compression, and it seems quite irregular since the 
> detection rate is not directly proportional to the JPEG compression 
> quality.=20 Did anyone also encounter this situation before? Is it 
> normal or is there something wrong with any part of my system?
> i used Cox's additive embedding method and embedded all AC coefficients.

What are you using to JPEG-encode the images? Did you confirm that at 90% quality the compressed image size is larger than at 70%?
Johann

--


______________________________________________________________________________

Watermarking Mailing List - http://www.watermarkingworld.org/ml.html
To unsubscribe send email to "majordomo@watermarkingworld.org" with
"unsubscribe watermarking YOURMAIL" in the body.
______________________________________________________________________________




© 2000-2002 by WatermarkingWorld
Design and Concept by Martin Kutter